<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update for OurDelta 9.04 Jaunty builds of MySQL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ourdelta.org/update-for-ourdelta-904-jaunty-builds/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ourdelta.org/update-for-ourdelta-904-jaunty-builds</link>
	<description>Enhanced, packaged convenience for MySQL and MariaDB</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 23:33:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: arjen</title>
		<link>http://ourdelta.org/update-for-ourdelta-904-jaunty-builds#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>arjen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ourdelta.org/?p=407#comment-724</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification Colin!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification Colin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Watson</title>
		<link>http://ourdelta.org/update-for-ourdelta-904-jaunty-builds#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ourdelta.org/?p=407#comment-721</guid>
		<description>No, that wasn&#039;t what happened. See the changelog:

mysql-dfsg-5.0 (5.1.30really5.0.75-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low

  * No change upload. Rebuild so that libmysqlclient15-dev is again available
    in jaunty. mysql-dfsg-5.1_5.1.30-2ubuntu1 provided a libmysqlclient15-dev
    transitional package. -2ubuntu2 doesn&#039;t provide libmysqlclient15-dev
    anymore. (LP: &lt;a href=&quot;https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316280&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;#316280&lt;/a&gt;).

 -- Mathias Gug   Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:24:13 -0500

We pulled in MySQL 5.1 from Debian experimental, because some other packages needed it (Amarok, if I remember correctly, though I haven&#039;t checked). I don&#039;t believe it was ever intended to become the default for everything. Unfortunately the uploader didn&#039;t notice that the mysql-dfsg-5.1 source package delivered a libmysqlclient15-dev, which took over the one previously delivered by mysql-dfsg-5.0. In order to undo this mistake, there was no alternative but to increase the version number.

Regardless of the structure of the version numbers, any add-ons you deliver to an Ubuntu release will need to have higher version numbers than the packages in the release in order to work properly; it makes no difference at all why the version numbers were changed. You can use &lt;code&gt;dpkg --compare-versions&lt;/code&gt; to test this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, that wasn&#8217;t what happened. See the changelog:</p>
<p>mysql-dfsg-5.0 (5.1.30really5.0.75-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low</p>
<p>  * No change upload. Rebuild so that libmysqlclient15-dev is again available<br />
    in jaunty. mysql-dfsg-5.1_5.1.30-2ubuntu1 provided a libmysqlclient15-dev<br />
    transitional package. -2ubuntu2 doesn&#8217;t provide libmysqlclient15-dev<br />
    anymore. (LP: <a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316280" rel="nofollow">#316280</a>).</p>
<p> &#8212; Mathias Gug   Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:24:13 -0500</p>
<p>We pulled in MySQL 5.1 from Debian experimental, because some other packages needed it (Amarok, if I remember correctly, though I haven&#8217;t checked). I don&#8217;t believe it was ever intended to become the default for everything. Unfortunately the uploader didn&#8217;t notice that the mysql-dfsg-5.1 source package delivered a libmysqlclient15-dev, which took over the one previously delivered by mysql-dfsg-5.0. In order to undo this mistake, there was no alternative but to increase the version number.</p>
<p>Regardless of the structure of the version numbers, any add-ons you deliver to an Ubuntu release will need to have higher version numbers than the packages in the release in order to work properly; it makes no difference at all why the version numbers were changed. You can use <code>dpkg --compare-versions</code> to test this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

